Interest-based Stream (Java)

Interest-based Stream in JetStream

As the name suggests, the interest retention policy for a stream retains messages for as long as there are consumers which have interest in a particular message.

The base case is where there are no consumers for the streams and messages are being appended. What happens to those messages? By definition, they are immediately deleted from the stream since there are no consumers.

An interest-based stream provides a middle ground between an at-most-once quality of service (QoS) that core NATS provides, requiring all subscribers to be connected to receive a message, and a pure limits-based stream. As long as there are consumers for the stream whose subject filter overlaps with a message appended to a stream, the message won’t be deleted until a subscription bound to each consumer has successfully acks the message, terminates it, or the max redelivery has been reached.

Note that this retention policy is additive to any limits set on the stream. As a contrived example, if max-msgs is set to one with old messages being discarded, every new message that is received by the stream will result in the prior message being deleted regardless if any of the consumer subscriptions were available to process the message.

In this example, we will walk through the interest-based retention behaviors in code. If you are new to streams, it is recommended to read the limits-based stream example prior to reading this one. Alternatively, if you are in need of a stream behaving as a queue, check out the work-queue stream.

CLI Go Python JavaScript Rust C# Java Ruby Elixir Crystal C

Jump to the output or the recording

$ nbe run jetstream/interest-stream/java

View the source code or learn how to run this example yourself

Code

package example;


import io.nats.client.*;
import io.nats.client.api.*;
import io.nats.client.impl.NatsJetStreamMetaData;


import java.io.IOException;
import java.time.Duration;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;


public class Main {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        String natsURL = System.getenv("NATS_URL");
        if (natsURL == null) {
            natsURL = "nats://127.0.0.1:4222";
        }

Initialize a connection to the server. The connection is AutoCloseable on exit.

        try (Connection nc = Nats.connect(natsURL)) {

Create JetStream and JetStreamManagement to use the NATS JetStream API. It allows creating and managing streams and consumers as well as publishing to streams and consuming messages from streams.

            JetStream js = nc.jetStream();
            JetStreamManagement jsm = nc.jetStreamManagement();

Creating the stream

Define the stream configuration, specifying Interest for retention, and create the stream.

            String streamName = "EVENTS";
            StreamConfiguration config = StreamConfiguration.builder()
                    .name(streamName)
                    .subjects("events.>")
                    .retentionPolicy(RetentionPolicy.Interest)
                    .build();


            StreamInfo stream = jsm.addStream(config);
            System.out.println("Created the stream.");

To demonstrate the base case behavior of the stream without any consumers, we will publish a few messages to the stream.

            js.publish("events.page_loaded", null);
            js.publish("events.mouse_clicked", null);
            PublishAck ack = js.publish("events.input_focused", null);
            System.out.println("Published 3 messages.");

We confirm that all three messages were published and the last message sequence is 3.

            System.out.printf("Last message seq: %d\n", ack.getSeqno());

Checking out the stream info, notice how zero messages are present in the stream, but the last_seq is 3 which matches the last ack’ed publish sequence above. Also notice that the first_seq is one greater which behaves as a sentinel value indicating the stream is empty. This sequence has not been assigned to a message yet, but can be interpreted as no messages available in this context.

            System.out.println("# Stream info without any consumers");
            printStreamState(jsm, streamName);

Adding a consumer

Now let’s add a pull consumer and publish a few more messages. Also note that we are only creating the consumer and have not yet started consuming the messages. This is only to point out that it is not required to be actively consuming messages to show interest, but it is the presence of a consumer which the stream cares about to determine retention of messages. [pull]: /examples/jetstream/pull-consumer/java

            StreamContext streamContext = js.getStreamContext(streamName);
            ConsumerContext consumerContext = streamContext.createOrUpdateConsumer(ConsumerConfiguration.builder()
                    .durable("processor-1")
                    .ackPolicy(AckPolicy.Explicit)
                    .build());


            js.publish("events.mouse_clicked", null);
            js.publish("events.input_focused", null);

If we inspect the stream info again, we will notice a few differences. It shows two messages (which we expect) and the first and last sequences corresponding to the two messages we just published. We also see that the consumer_count is now one.

            System.out.println("\n# Stream info with one consumer");
            printStreamState(jsm, streamName);

Now that the consumer is there and showing interest in the messages, we know they will remain until we process the messages. Let’s fetch the two messages and ack them.

            try (FetchConsumer fc = consumerContext.fetchMessages(2)) {
                Message m = fc.nextMessage();
                while (m != null) {
                    m.ackSync(Duration.ofSeconds(5));
                    m = fc.nextMessage();
                }
            }

What do we expect in the stream? No messages and the first_seq has been set to the next sequence number like in the base case. ☝️ As a quick aside on that second ack, We are using ackSync here for this example to ensure the stream state has been synced up for this subsequent retrieval.

            System.out.println("\n# Stream info with one consumer and acked messages");
            printStreamState(jsm, streamName);

Two or more consumers

Since each consumer represents a separate view over a stream, we would expect that if messages were processed by one consumer, but not the other, the messages would be retained. This is indeed the case.

            ConsumerContext consumerContext2 = streamContext.createOrUpdateConsumer(ConsumerConfiguration.builder()
                    .durable("processor-2")
                    .ackPolicy(AckPolicy.Explicit)
                    .build());


            js.publish("events.input_focused", null);
            js.publish("events.mouse_clicked", null);

Here we fetch 2 messages for processor-2. There are two observations to make here. First the fetched messages are the latest two messages that were published just above and not any prior messages since these were already deleted from the stream. This should be apparent now, but this reinforces that a late consumer cannot retroactively show interest. The second point is that the stream info shows that the latest two messages are still present in the stream. This is also expected since the first consumer had not yet processed them.

            List<NatsJetStreamMetaData> messagesMetadata = new ArrayList<>();
            try (FetchConsumer fc = consumerContext2.fetchMessages(2)) {
                Message m = fc.nextMessage();
                while (m != null) {
                    m.ackSync(Duration.ofSeconds(5));
                    messagesMetadata.add(m.metaData());
                    m = fc.nextMessage();
                }
            }


            System.out.printf("Msg seqs %d and %d\n", messagesMetadata.get(0).streamSequence(), messagesMetadata.get(1).streamSequence());


            System.out.println("\n# Stream info with two consumers, but only one set of acked messages");
            printStreamState(jsm, streamName);

Fetching and ack’ing from the first consumer subscription will result in the messages being deleted.

            try (FetchConsumer fc = consumerContext.fetchMessages(2)) {
                Message m = fc.nextMessage();
                while (m != null) {
                    m.ackSync(Duration.ofSeconds(5));
                    m = fc.nextMessage();
                }
            }


            System.out.println("\n# Stream info with two consumers having both acked");
            printStreamState(jsm, streamName);

A final callout is that interest respects the FilterSubject on a consumer. For example, if a consumer defines a filter only for events.mouse_clicked events then it won’t be considered interested in events such as events.input_focused.

            streamContext.createOrUpdateConsumer(ConsumerConfiguration.builder()
                    .durable("processor-3")
                    .ackPolicy(AckPolicy.Explicit)
                    .filterSubject("events.mouse_clicked")
                    .build());


            js.publish("events.input_focused", null);

Fetch and term (also works) and ack from the first consumers that do have interest.

            Message m = consumerContext.next();
            m.term();
            m = consumerContext2.next();
            m.ackSync(Duration.ofSeconds(5));


            System.out.println("\n# Stream info with three consumers with interest from two");
            printStreamState(jsm, streamName);
        } catch (Exception e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    }


    private static void printStreamState(JetStreamManagement jsm, String streamName) throws IOException, JetStreamApiException {
        StreamInfo streamInfo = jsm.getStreamInfo(streamName);
        System.out.println(streamInfo.getStreamState());
    }
}

Output

Created the stream.
Published 3 messages.
Last message seq: 3
# Stream info without any consumers
StreamState{msgs=0, bytes=0, firstSeq=4, lastSeq=3, consumerCount=0, firstTime=2024-08-08T16:17:56.289297131Z[GMT], lastTime=2024-08-08T16:17:56.289297131Z[GMT], subjectCount=0, subjects=[], deletedCount=0, deleteds=[], lostStreamData=null}

# Stream info with one consumer
StreamState{msgs=2, bytes=100, firstSeq=4, lastSeq=5, consumerCount=1, firstTime=2024-08-08T16:17:56.308357264Z[GMT], lastTime=2024-08-08T16:17:56.308743644Z[GMT], subjectCount=2, subjects=[], deletedCount=0, deleteds=[], lostStreamData=null}

# Stream info with one consumer and acked messages
StreamState{msgs=0, bytes=0, firstSeq=6, lastSeq=5, consumerCount=1, firstTime=1970-01-01T00:00Z[GMT], lastTime=2024-08-08T16:17:56.308743644Z[GMT], subjectCount=0, subjects=[], deletedCount=0, deleteds=[], lostStreamData=null}
Msg seqs 6 and 7

# Stream info with two consumers, but only one set of acked messages
StreamState{msgs=2, bytes=100, firstSeq=6, lastSeq=7, consumerCount=2, firstTime=2024-08-08T16:17:56.327166506Z[GMT], lastTime=2024-08-08T16:17:56.327501754Z[GMT], subjectCount=2, subjects=[], deletedCount=0, deleteds=[], lostStreamData=null}

# Stream info with two consumers having both acked
StreamState{msgs=0, bytes=0, firstSeq=8, lastSeq=7, consumerCount=2, firstTime=1970-01-01T00:00Z[GMT], lastTime=2024-08-08T16:17:56.327501754Z[GMT], subjectCount=0, subjects=[], deletedCount=0, deleteds=[], lostStreamData=null}

# Stream info with three consumers with interest from two
StreamState{msgs=0, bytes=0, firstSeq=9, lastSeq=8, consumerCount=3, firstTime=1970-01-01T00:00Z[GMT], lastTime=2024-08-08T16:17:56.337861905Z[GMT], subjectCount=0, subjects=[], deletedCount=0, deleteds=[], lostStreamData=null}

Recording

Note, playback is half speed to make it a bit easier to follow.